ECOLOGY NEWS

27 February 2009 • Roy Dyer

Protected species advice for Utility Arborists

Recent changes to the protection measures for wildlife and their habitats will have an impact on the way that utility tree work should be carried out. Arboricultural companies must ensure that their staff are familiar with protected species and the habitats they are likely to come across.

Last year’s amendments to the Wildlife and Countryside ACT 1981 (as amended), and the Conservation (Natural Habitats, &c.) Regulations 1994 were the latest in a series of protection measures for wildlife and their habitats. Additional species have received protection, defences have been withdrawn, penalties have increased and definitions have been refined.It is no longer an adequate defence to suggest that damage to a European Protected Species or its habitat was accidental, or due to a lack of knowledge of its existence on a specific site.

Protected species most likely to be encountered when carrying out utility tree work include nesting birds, Bats, and Common Dormice, but other species, including Badgers, Great-Crested Newts and reptiles, may be affected by other work on the ground. The problem for most arborists is that whilst they are likely to be very familiar with obvious signs of protected species e.g. bird’s nests and Badger setts, other species such as Bats and Dormice are less easy to detect. So where, for instance there are Bat habitats present e.g. cracks and crevices in trees, it may be necessary to call in a Bat specialist to carry out a proper survey to determine whether bats are present or not.   

The first line of defence for arboricultural companies is to make sure that both they are their staff are familiar with all the protected species and their habitats they are likely to come across. This is likely to involve some basic training.

It is then essential to inspect all work sites and any affected trees or vegetation in advance of the work.  Where swathes of trees need to be cleared beneath electricity lines, the potential damage to protected species and/or their habitats is obviously increased.Whilst all this may mean extra expense for arborists, some or all of the expense can and should be passed directly on to the clients. In addition, the costs are low when compared to the alternatives or not complying with environmental legislation.  Up to six months imprisonment can result and fines up to £5,000 per offence - that is per creature injured, killed or disturbed, can be incurred!

For more information please contact Roy Dyer by e-mail roy.dyer@adas.co.uk or telephone 01483 212951.

OTHER ECOLOGY ARTICLES

Brownfield Biodiversity
06 April 2009

Brownfield Biodiversity

Open Mosaic Habitats on Previously Developed Land (Brownfield sites) has recently been included in the new list of UKBAP Priority Habitats and species. ADAS has been appointed by Defra...

Species of the Month: Badgers
02 June 2009

Species of the Month: Badgers

Badgers are widespread across the whole country in almost all types of terrain and because digging and baiting still affect badgers in certain areas they are protected in law. More.......

Bexhill badgers contained
19 May 2009

Bexhill badgers contained

At Bexhill in East Sussex, ADAS Environmental Consultants devised a solution to deal with Badgers when a sett threatened to undermine an electricity substation.

A Rough Guide to the Hedgerows Legislation 1997
01 October 2009

A Rough Guide to the Hedgerows Legislation 1997

Are you aware that unauthorised destruction of even a short length of hedgerow could result in a fine of £5,000 or more and the cost of reinstatement? If you...

A Rough Guide to Tree Preservation Legislation
01 October 2009

A Rough Guide to Tree Preservation Legislation

Legislation was introduced to protect trees and woodlands which make a significant impact on their local surroundings. It is particularly relevant where there is a perceived threat to a tree,...