LEGISLATION NEWS

26 February 2010 • James Packer

New and useful guidance in relation to the Protection of Badgers Act 1992

Badger setts, as well as Badgers themselves are protected by the Protection of Badgers Act 1992. This defines a Badger sett as “any structure or place which displays signs indicating current use by a Badger”. New guidance, issued by Natural England at the end of June 2009 provides some help as to what constitutes ‘current use’.

The guidance emphasises that current use is not the same as current occupation, which means that a sett does not have to have a Badger in it to be covered by the Act. However, a sett does need to have some field signs at it to be classed as in current use. Once all Badger field signs have disappeared from the sett, it ceases to be currently used, and is therefore not protected by the Act.

The length of time that Badger field signs, such as bedding, footprints, foraging signs or droppings, remain around the sett once Badgers have stopped using it, will be very variable. Temperature, precipitation, soil type, local topography and other external factors will therefore affect the length of time that an unoccupied sett is protected.

A cautious approach to assessing current use is required to determine whether a sett is protected by the Act, as well as a very accurate assessment and evaluation of Badger field signs.

The Act also makes it an offence to disturb a Badger whilst it is occupying a sett. Firstly, a Badger needs to be in a sett for an offence of distu...

Register to view all of this article »

REGISTER TO READ MORE

......it's free and easy.

We want to be able to provide you with information that relates to your specific needs. Please fill out your contact details to continue reading this article.

Simply fill in this form

Choose your username & password

(4-12 characters, letter and numbers only)

OTHER LEGISLATION ARTICLES

Could you be guilty of deliberate disturbance? The Supreme Court rules on the Habitats Directive
25 May 2011

Could you be guilty of deliberate disturbance? The Supreme Court rules on the Habitats Directive

A recent Supreme Court case has helped to clarify what is meant by the Habitats Directive “deliberate disturbance” offence. The case also confirms the obligation of planning authorities to have...

Crop protection priorities: potential impacts of loss of pesticides in UK
19 May 2011

Crop protection priorities: potential impacts of loss of pesticides in UK

ADAS has completed a series of projects assessing the impacts of changing availability of pesticides. These reports cover all key crops and highlight the areas of greatest importance and action....

Schedule 9 Invasive Plant Species
21 March 2011

Schedule 9 Invasive Plant Species

Non-native, invasive plant species such as Japanese Knotweed can often be found along stream banks, roadsides, railway embankments and brownfield sites where they can pose a significant constraint and extra...

OTHER RELATED ARTICLES

Advance action saves EDF Energy’s capital works programme
02 March 2009

Advance action saves EDF Energy’s capital works programme

ADAS advice to EDF Energy on protection of wildlife within the High Weald Area of Outstanding Beauty in Kent meant that permission for vital improvements to their routes could go...

Bexhill badgers contained
19 May 2009

Bexhill badgers contained

At Bexhill in East Sussex, ADAS Environmental Consultants devised a solution to deal with Badgers when a sett threatened to undermine an electricity substation.